|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Silvara Nocturn
Nocturn Industries
54
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 00:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
All this could not have happened without eve assets so its not entirely out of game. I think ccp could make a case for this if they want to take action.
This entire thread is arguing semantics and bad analogies and should be nuked. |
Silvara Nocturn
Nocturn Industries
54
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 09:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
Navi Annages wrote:Right right. I see compaines that are out to make profits swinging ban hammers to and from against people that don't break EULA's. Get real chief. Anonymity is the word of the day. No Eula Breach no nada happen. Like I said Grey. If they take any side without a EULA breach they run into litigation issues. No business opens themselves to litigation without having there bum covered. In this case Erotica 1 is covered.
I look forward to Erotica 1 presenting his/her case to european courts. |
Silvara Nocturn
Nocturn Industries
56
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 22:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
If you want sokhar banned feel free to start a thread as it has nothing to do with the bonus room and jesters blogpost. |
Silvara Nocturn
Nocturn Industries
59
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 07:32:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP has to take action because this game is rated pegi 12 and allows minors to play. If this happens to a child they are royally screwed and rightfully so. The only way for them to allow this behaviour is to raise the age limit up to 18 or 21 depending on country. Which they I doubt they will do.
You can claim that no one would subject a child to this but that would be a baseless claim. You can claim that this can happen anyway, while this is true CCP will still be held accountable for the fact that they allow this sort of behaviour in a game that allows minors to play.Online Interactions are not rated, but you can't ignore them either. Especially since EO gameplay is mostly online interactions.
As for choice, yes Sohkar had a choice he could have stopped it. Erotica 1 also had a choice, he could have stopped it too. Neither choices are consequential to the question at hand. Does the Eve Online community think what Erotica 1 has done is acceptable? |
Silvara Nocturn
Nocturn Industries
61
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 07:45:00 -
[5] - Quote
lollerwaffle wrote:Silvara Nocturn wrote:CCP has to take action because this game is rated pegi 12 and allows minors to play. If this happens to a child they are royally screwed and rightfully so. The only way for them to allow this behaviour is to raise the age limit up to 18 or 21 depending on country. Which they I doubt they will do.
You can claim that no one would subject a child to this but that would be a baseless claim. You can claim that this can happen anyway, while this is true CCP will still be held accountable for the fact that they allow this sort of behaviour in a game that allows minors to play.Online Interactions are not rated, but you can't ignore them either. Especially since EO gameplay is mostly online interactions.
As for choice, yes Sohkar had a choice he could have stopped it. Erotica 1 also had a choice, he could have stopped it too. Neither choices are consequential to the question at hand. Does the Eve Online community think what Erotica 1 has done is acceptable? CCP should do the parents' jobs for them? Game is rated 12+, doesn't mean parents can throw away all sense of responsibility in educating their children and expose them to this behaviour, for which the game is fairly well known. Parents who don't know anything about this game should make it their responsibility to at least google it instead of throwing away all common sense and responsibilities because of the '12+' label.
CCP will still be held responsible whether it's right or wrong is inconsequential. |
Silvara Nocturn
Nocturn Industries
61
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 08:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tarojan wrote:This is just going round and round. Angry shouty brigade says "bullying scumbag!" sensible people say "its a game not reality" Angry shouty brigade yell odd words like torture! cyber bullying! breachs of Eula! bad publicity! sensible people patatiently explain why thats not true and in fact diminishs the meanings of those words and insults real victims of them.
then everyone goes to bed and the same stuff gets written by 2 new groups of people.
I think those "sensible" people are nitpicking across the board to try and deflect from the question at hand. Do you think Erotica 1's behaviour and the bonus room is acceptable? |
Silvara Nocturn
Nocturn Industries
63
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 12:13:00 -
[7] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Abrei-Kaii wrote: Please provide proof
I'm sure if you ask nicely E1 can link you some of the recording of people who have won. In the meantime I will tell you, as a scammer, that this scam would not work if it got out that it was impossible to win the bonus room. You have to make it possible to win otherwise people will not fall for the bait.
Erotica 1 and the other scammers will do anything to get people to think they can win. Including faking evidence to prove it or letting the smaller fish swim while the reel in the whales. Yes you have to make it seem plausible that they can win. That's the whole idea of a scam. A person thinks he can beat the system, but the system is rigged against it and when he finds out it's too late.
If the particpant has an honest chance to win it's NOT a scam! You should know that as a so called "scammer". |
Silvara Nocturn
Nocturn Industries
66
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 06:28:00 -
[8] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:So, since the witch hunt has been outed as a witch hunt, what do we do now?
My thought is, we make a list. Since, thanks to Sohkar, it has been revealed that it's laughable to call it torture, and no harm was really done... then what we really have here is precisely what it looked like.
A textbook example of demagoguery, trying to whip up people into a lynch mob against someone, because you don't like something about them.
But since Ripard Teg is now the Fred Phelps of EVE, who are the rest of the Westboros? I say we start getting some names down. For our own mutual protection, of course.
Thoughts?
Feel free to add me to that list, I really don't consider Erotica 1's behaviour acceptable. |
|
|
|